Kia Shuma 2001 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003

 
Kia Shuma
2001 - 2004
Hyundai Elantra
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 114 HP132 HP
Torque: 152 NM166 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.7 seconds
Hyundai Elantra is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Shuma engine produces 18 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai Elantra. Due to the lower power, Kia Shuma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.2
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Shuma consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Shuma could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway840 km on highway
Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Carens, Kia Sephia, Kia ClarusInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Matrix
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Shuma might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Kia Shuma engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.52 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma and Hyundai Elantra are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1207 litres1401 litres
Kia Shuma has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 194 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`6451`845
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Kia Shuma has
  • roomier boot
Hyundai Elantra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv