Kia Shuma 2001 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Kia Shuma engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Shuma consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Shuma could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is smaller. Kia Shuma is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Kia Shuma has 60 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |