Kia Shuma 2001 vs Hyundai Elantra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Kia Shuma engine produces 6 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, but torque is 2 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Cerato, Kia Carens | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |