Kia Shuma 2001 vs Audi S3 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Kia Shuma engine produces 109 HP less power than Audi S3, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Audi S3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.1 | |
|
The Kia Shuma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Shuma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S3, which means that by driving the Kia Shuma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Audi S3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Kia Shuma is 35 cm longer than the Audi S3, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1020 litres | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 170 litres more trunk space than the Audi S3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi S3, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Audi S3 has
| |