Kia Shuma 1998 vs Opel Vectra 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Shuma
1998 - 2001
Opel Vectra
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol)1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 88 - 111 HP75 - 170 HP
Torque: 135 - 152 NM128 - 270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 13.8 seconds8.5 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.9 - 9.55.8 - 10.3
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.50 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Vectra, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 328 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
780 litres1423 litres
Opel Vectra has more luggage space.
Kia Shuma has 152 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vectra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Vectra (by 643 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Vectra, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`627~ 1`842
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Kia Shuma has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Vectra has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv