Kia Shuma 1998 vs Skoda Octavia 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 111 HP | 60 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 152 NM | 118 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 8.5 - 18.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.5 | 5.1 - 9.2 | |
|
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 1330 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Kia Shuma has 202 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 550 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`627 | ~ 1`786 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |