Kia Shuma 1998 vs Kia Sephia 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 - 111 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 152 NM | 120 - 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.5 | 7.9 - 8.4 | |
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sephia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Kia Shuma is larger. Kia Shuma is 23 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sephia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`627 | ~ 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Sephia has
| |