Kia Shuma 1998 vs Citroen Xantia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 111 HP | 75 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 152 NM | 135 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 8.2 - 17.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.5 | 5.5 - 11.6 | |
|
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Shuma is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`627 | ~ 1`461 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |