Kia Shuma 2001 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 - 114 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 152 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 3.76 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.53 m | |
Kia Shuma is larger, but lower. Kia Shuma is 76 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 275 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | no data | |
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 165 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Kia Shuma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 886 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |