Kia Shuma 2001 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Kia Shuma is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Liana can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 - 114 HP | 90 - 106 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 152 NM | 116 - 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | 11.7 - 13.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 6.7 - 8.2 | |
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Liana. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.55 m | |
Kia Shuma is larger, but lower. Kia Shuma is 28 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 348 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | 1149 litres | |
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 92 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 58 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Liana. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |