Kia Shuma 2001 vs Suzuki Liana 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Shuma
2001 - 2004
Suzuki Liana
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Kia Shuma is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Liana can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.81.3 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 101 - 114 HP90 - 106 HP
Torque: 148 - 152 NM116 - 144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 13.5 seconds11.7 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.0 - 9.86.7 - 8.2
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Liana.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.24 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.55 m
Kia Shuma is larger, but lower.
Kia Shuma is 28 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres348 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1207 litres1149 litres
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity.
Kia Shuma has 92 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 58 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Liana.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`635~ 1`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Kia Shuma has
  • roomier boot
Suzuki Liana has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv