Kia Shuma 2001 vs Rover 45 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 114 HP | 100 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 152 NM | 123 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 45. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is larger. Kia Shuma is 16 cm longer than the Rover 45, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | 717 litres | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 60 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 45, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 1`681 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Rover 45 has
| |