Kia Shuma 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Shuma is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 114 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 152 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is smaller. Kia Shuma is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Kia Shuma has 39 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 535 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |