Kia Shuma 2001 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 114 HP | 105 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 152 NM | 143 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 6.4 - 8.4 | |
|
Kia Shuma petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma and Hyundai Elantra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | 1401 litres | |
| Kia Shuma has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 1`816 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |