Kia Sephia 1996 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Kia Sephia engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mazda 323. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sephia consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 323 has
| |