Kia Sephia 1996 vs Mazda 323 1994

 
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 80 HP90 HP
Torque: 125 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds11.8 seconds
Kia Sephia engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda 323. Despite less power, Kia Sephia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Kia Sephia consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sephia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway910 km on highway
600 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.03 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.40 m
Kia Sephia is 22 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data300 litres
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 323.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`575
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Kia Sephia has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 323 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv