Kia Sephia 1998 vs Rover 400 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 143 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sephia engine produces 27 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Kia Sephia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.8 | |
Kia Sephia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 6 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Kia Sephia has 100 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Rover 400, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Rover 400 has
| |