Kia Sephia 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Kia Sephia engine produces 200 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 233 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.8 | |
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sephia consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Kia Sephia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
Kia Sephia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 22 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |