Kia Sephia 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sephia engine produces 31 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Kia Sephia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Sephia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Sephia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia and Mitsubishi Lancer are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |