Kia Sephia 1996 vs Mazda 626 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 125 NM | 145 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.6 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, the Kia Sephia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia Sephia is smaller. Kia Sephia is 33 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`350 | ~ 1`703 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |