Kia Sephia 1996 vs Mazda 626 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 (petrol)1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 80 HP90 - 136 HP
Torque: 120 - 125 NM145 - 220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds9.6 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.9 - 8.45.2 - 8.9
On average, the Kia Sephia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.58 m
Width: 1.69 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Kia Sephia is smaller.
Kia Sephia is 33 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data502 litres
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`350~ 1`703
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Kia Sephia has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 626 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv