Kia Sephia 1996 vs Kia Shuma 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 88 - 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 125 NM | 135 - 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 8.4 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Kia Sephia petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Kia Sephia is smaller. Kia Sephia is 23 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`350 | ~ 1`627 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
| |