Kia Sephia 1998 vs Nissan Almera 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 111 HP | 90 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 152 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 15.4 seconds | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.1 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia Sephia petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sephia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
692 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Sephia has 23 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Kia Sephia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`593 | ~ 1`734 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |