Kia Sephia 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Lancer is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Kia Sephia petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia and Mitsubishi Lancer are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`400 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |