Kia RIO 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 97 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 143 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.0 | |
Kia RIO consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |