Kia RIO 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Kia RIO over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia RIO consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |