Kia RIO 2011 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Kia RIO engine produces 21 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Despite the higher power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 698 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 278 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`573 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Chevrolet Aveo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |