Kia RIO 2011 vs Kia Cerato 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 107 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 23 HP less power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Kia RIO over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine Kia Cerato 2013 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 19 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 482 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 18 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |