Kia RIO 2011 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, but torque is 13 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Despite the higher power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Fiesta engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max, Ford B-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia RIO might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia RIO is 10 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 295 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 71 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Kia RIO scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia RIO has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Kia RIO quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |