Kia RIO 2011 vs Hyundai i10 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i10 is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 2 HP less power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 1 NM more than Hyundai i10. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i10 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Kia RIO over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia RIO consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia RIO gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but lower. Kia RIO is 38 cm longer than the Hyundai i10, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
|
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 28 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.9 metres more than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |