Kia RIO 2011 vs Nissan Tiida 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 117 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 158 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Nissan Tiida is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 42 HP less power than Nissan Tiida, but torque is 12 NM more than Nissan Tiida. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 6.4 | |
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Kia RIO over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1430 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Kia RIO gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Nissan Tiida 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.53 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 34 cm shorter than the Nissan Tiida, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 307 litres | |
Nissan Tiida has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 83 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`204 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |