Kia RIO 2015 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Note, but torque is 65 NM less than Nissan Note. Despite the higher power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 3.6 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia RIO 2015 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia RIO 2015 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but lower. Kia RIO is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 37 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Nissan Note has
| |