Kia RIO 2017 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Kia RIO and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Kia RIO torque is 40 NM more than Renault Clio. Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 25 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Renault Clio has
| |