Kia RIO 2017 vs Renault Clio 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Kia RIO) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Renault Clio) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 96 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 39 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia RIO can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia RIO version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Kia RIO is 2 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 301 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
980 litres | 979 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 24 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`680 kg | 1`758 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`235 kg | 1`238 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 520 kg | |
| Kia RIO load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Renault Clio has
| |