Kia RIO 2011 vs Kia Cerato 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 55 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 13 NM more than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Kia Cerato 2013 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 19 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 482 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 18 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Cerato has
| |