Kia RIO 2011 vs Kia Cerato 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 40 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 63 NM more than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.5 | |
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Kia RIO over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Kia RIO gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Kia Cerato 2013 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 19 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 482 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 18 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |