Kia RIO 1999 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 2 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 24 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 261 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 189 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |