Kia RIO 2000 vs Mazda 323 1998

 
Kia RIO
2000 - 2002
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 108 HP88 HP
Torque: 140 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds14.5 seconds
Kia RIO is more dynamic to drive.
Kia RIO engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.2
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia RIO consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 510 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
630 km on highway800 km on highway
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.20 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 499 litres355 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1277 litres1000 litres
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity.
Kia RIO has 144 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 277 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 323, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Kia RIO has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv