Kia RIO 2003 vs Kia RIO 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Kia RIO 2003 and Kia RIO 2009 have the same engine power. Kia RIO 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.2 | |
|
The Kia RIO 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO 2003 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO 2003 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Kia RIO 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia RIO 2003 and Kia RIO 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Kia RIO 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO 2003 has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Kia RIO 2009, so Kia RIO 2009 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia RIO has
| |