Kia RIO 2003 vs Kia RIO 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO 2003 engine produces 15 HP less power than Kia RIO 2009. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia RIO 2003 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO 2003 could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia RIO 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia RIO 2003 and Kia RIO 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Kia RIO 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO 2003 has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Kia RIO 2009, so Kia RIO 2009 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia RIO has
| |