Kia RIO 2000 vs Kia RIO 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO 2000 engine produces 22 HP less power than Kia RIO 2005, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Kia RIO 2005. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia RIO 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia RIO 2000 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO 2000 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia RIO 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia RIO 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia RIO 2000 is 23 cm longer than the Kia RIO 2005, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO 2000 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO 2000 has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO 2000 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO 2000 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia RIO 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`471 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Kia RIO 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO 2000 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Kia RIO 2005, so Kia RIO 2005 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia RIO has
| |