Kia RIO 2003 vs Fiat Stilo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 13 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Stilo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`508 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |