Kia RIO 2011 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Kia RIO engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia RIO consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 42 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`609 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |