Kia RIO 2017 vs Citroen C4 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Kia RIO engine produces 36 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Citroen C4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia RIO consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.80 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 33 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 443 litres | |
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 37 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The Citroen C4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Citroen C4 scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |