Kia RIO 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 143 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 14.5 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 7.2 | 6.1 - 8.4 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`831 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |