Kia RIO 2015 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 - 123 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 155 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 13.5 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.4 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 87 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |