Kia RIO 2005 vs Kia RIO 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia RIO
2005 - 2009
Kia RIO
2009 - 2011
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.3 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia RIO 2005 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 97 - 112 HP97 HP
Torque: 125 - 235 NMn/a NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 - 14.5 seconds12.3 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 7.26.2 - 7.2
Kia RIO 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO 2009.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.99 m4.24 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Kia RIO 2005 is 25 cm shorter than the Kia RIO 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 272 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1107 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 metersno data
Gross weight: ~ 1`600 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 2000no data
Pros and Cons: Kia RIO has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • fewer faults
Kia RIO has
  • only petrol engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv