Kia RIO 2009 vs Mazda 2 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 2 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 75 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 119 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 14.5 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 6.9 | 4.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`499 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |