Kia RIO 2011 vs Hyundai i10 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 66 - 87 HP | |
Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | 12.3 - 16.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 4.3 - 6.2 | |
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i10. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 3.67 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Kia RIO is larger, but lower. Kia RIO is 38 cm longer than the Hyundai i10, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 252 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 28 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.9 metres more than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`447 | |
Safety: | |||
Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |