Kia RIO 2015 vs Mazda 2 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 123 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 135 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 16.5 seconds | 8.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.4 - 4.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | 950 litres | |
| Kia RIO has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`601 | ~ 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 2 has
| |