Kia RIO 2003 vs Volvo 850 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 7.4 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 445 litres | |
|
Volvo 850 has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 119 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 850. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo 850, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |