Kia RIO 2003 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 64 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 10.2 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 112 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`637 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |